- Formula Data Analytics
- Posts
- Mexican GP - Dominant Win Is An Understatement
Mexican GP - Dominant Win Is An Understatement
Lights to Flag: The Norris Masterclass


Lights to Flag: The Norris Masterclass
At the high altitude, high energy venue of the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez in Mexico City, the grid lit up and so did Lando Norris. Starting from pole position, he launched cleanly, held off the pack into Turn 1, and from then on it was his race from start to finish. The result: a commanding victory, with Norris finishing over 30 seconds ahead of the rest.
Norris himself described the day as “straightforward”, which in F1 language means: “I nailed the job while keeping the steering wheel straight”. His win also put him into the lead of the Drivers’ Championship by just one point ahead of his team mate. In short: Norris dominated, delivered, and smiled while doing it.

Turn 1 – The Scramble, The Jostle, The Early Chaos
Even though Norris was dominant, he had to survive the chaotic first moments. As the lights went out, several drivers battled three abreast into Turn 1. That meant that while Norris got his jump, others did not fare so smoothly. According to reports, the opening lap saw cars cutting corners and jockeying for position, the kind of mayhem that can instantly change a driver’s mission from “go for the win” to “just get to lap two”.
Norris emerged intact, meaning his pole to win script stayed alive. Meanwhile, his rivals had the harder jobs, pushing, defending, reacting. That early scramble meant that for some, the race was already compromised before the tyres even warmed up properly.
In that sense, Norris’ advantage didn’t just stem from car or driver, but from a clean getaway and staying out of trouble. He treated Turn 1 like a pinball machine he avoided.

Rookie Breakout: Oliver Bearman’s Performance
One of the biggest talking points from the weekend was the performance of Bearman. Driving for Haas F1 Team, the young Brit raced to a superb fourth place, his best F1 finish to date. He started from ninth on the grid, but by the flag he’d worked his way into fourth, proving maturity beyond his years. The race editors labelled it a “breakout ride”.
Bearman admitted afterwards he was somewhat dazed by the experience of battling seasoned drivers, “sh***ing myself”, he said, but he held his nerve when it counted.
For Haas, this is a clear signal that their investment in youth is paying off. Bearman showed pace, consistency, and race craft. If Norris was the textbook driver on track, Bearman was the energetic student writing a top grade essay.

The Recovery Drive: Oscar Piastri
If Bearman was the rising star, Piastri was the cautionary tale of what happens when the weekend doesn’t go your way. Piastri, who had led the championship heading into Mexico, qualified only seventh (after originally eighth) and noted himself the lack of pace was “a bit of a mystery”.
In the race, he dropped back early in the scramble, got stuck behind slower cars, and despite fighting back (including an overtake on George Russell on lap 61), he could only finish fifth. He ended up some 42 seconds behind Norris. Piastri himself admitted he’ll have to adapt his driving style and work harder to unlock the car’s full potential.
So while fifth is decent under the circumstances, for a driver who held a 14 point lead heading into the race, it’s a setback. The message: championships aren’t just won by fastest cars, consistency, qualifying and race starts matter big time.

Team Orders in the House: Mercedes‑AMG F1 Team’s Tactical Move
In the mid pack, one story less flashy but noteworthy was Mercedes’ use of team orders. Mid race at Mercedes, the drivers (Antonelli and Russell) were told to shuffle positions to optimise team strategy and minimise intra team squabbles.
At this point in the season, even teams like Mercedes who aren’t fighting for the title are thinking ahead: every point counts for Constructors’ standings, every safe finish helps. Their team orders manoeuvre may not have made front page splash, but it reflects how F1 isn’t just wheel to wheel driving, it’s chess at 200 mph.

The Charge: Max Verstappen’s Push for Second
Starting from fifth on the grid, Verstappen was never going to catch Norris. But behind him, the battle for the other podium spots was alive. Verstappen drove well, made up ground, and by the final stint was closing in on second place. However, a late intervention of a Virtual Safety Car (VSC) curtailed his momentum.
He settled for third, just 0.7 seconds behind the runner up. Not quite second, but given his start position and the car’s relative form, a decent result. The caveat: if the VSC hadn’t intervened, he might well have had a real shot at P2.
Still, Verstappen reminded us why he’s always dangerous when he’s charging from behind.

Virtual Safety Car: The Late Twist
The race had a late twist: a Virtual Safety Car period. Carlos Sainz pulling over (and subsequent marshals’ intervention) triggered the VSC, which neutralised the field and effectively froze the running order in the final laps.
For some drivers this was a blessing, for others a missed opportunity. For Verstappen in particular, it shut down the chance to make a final push on fresher rubber with the gap closing. And for Piastri, any momentum imaginable stalled.
It may not be as dramatic as a full Safety Car with a bunched‐up field, but in tightly contested races the VSC can change the ending in subtle ways. Think of it like hitting pause on a movie just when the hero is about to leap, only to miss the splash.

The Booing of the Winner
A curious moment after the flag: Norris was booed by portions of the crowd even though he had delivered a stellar result. According to reports, the boos were unexpected given his dominance.
Why the boos? Hard to say definitively. F1 crowds are more often polite than pugnacious, but local fan loyalties, perceived rivalries or even just frustration at lack of action can lead to odd reactions. Norris kept his composure, raised the trophy and gave the crowd a wave.
In a way, the boos almost made the moment more interesting. A reminder that in F1, the winners don’t always get a standing ovation, there may be admiration, but the crowd always has its own voice.

Tyre Strategy, Clean Air & Altitude
While the headline is Norris dominating, the underlying detail helps explain why. The high altitude of the Mexico City circuit means thinner air, which complicates engine cooling and aerodynamics. Teams have to manage tyres carefully, because overheating can bite sooner than at sea level.
McLaren got the tyre management spot on. Norris enjoyed clean air ahead after the first laps, which allowed him to build a gap without battling. That puts huge pressure on the chasing pack, because they must work harder, through dirty air, to catch up.
In contrast, Piastri got stuck behind slower cars early, lost time, and then had to push harder, burning tyres, energy reserves, and hope. Bearman, meanwhile, kept in clean air at key moments and delivered a smart drive.
All of which add up to: a race isn’t just about raw pace, it’s about when you’re in the right position, how your tyres are doing, and whether you can steer clear of trouble.

Championship Implications & The Road Ahead
With this win, Norris moves into the lead of the Drivers’ Championship by just one point over Piastri, with Charles Leclerc and Verstappen further back.
McLaren now holds the momentum. They are already Constructors’ Champions, so the focus shifts entirely to the Drivers’ title. Having the lead at this stage is psychologically important. As one pundit put it: “If you have the lead with four races to go, you’re in the driver’s seat, metaphorically, at least.” 
For Piastri, it’s time to regroup. He’s still right there in the points, still clearly quick, but needs a weekend like Norris just had. Similarly, Verstappen remains a threat, his podium keeps him alive in the title fight.
Teams like Mercedes, Ferrari and Haas also have stories to tell. Bearman and Haas will ride high; Mercedes will continue refining tactics; Ferrari will want more. The next rounds will unfold like chapters in a thriller.
In short: this race didn’t settle the championship, but it turned a corner.

Final Verdict: The Good, The Mischievous & The Surprising
The Good: Norris showed why he’s a top tier driver when everything clicks. Pole to flag, gap building, no silly mistakes.
The Mischievous: Turn 1 mayhem reminded us races can spin on seconds. The VSC twist kept things from being completely predictable.
The Surprising: The booing of the winner. Bearman’s breakout finish. Piastri’s mystery pace drop.
The Takeaway: Dominant races don’t always mean effortless ones. Norris made it look easy, but behind that was a car that held up at altitude, a brain that managed the gap, and an early getaway that protected him.
For the rest: get your starts better, make strategy count, avoid the sizzle of early chaos, and keep your tyres in check.

Analysis
Tyre Strategy Analysis:
The tyre chart looks more like a modern art piece than a race plan, but there’s method in the madness. Most front runners went soft–medium–soft, with Norris and Leclerc both running long first stints before switching to mediums mid race, and softs again for the sprint to the flag. Verstappen’s strategy was a mirrored reverse almost exactly, though his medium stint came a bit shorter, forcing him to manage wear in the final laps on the softs. The McLarens split strategy, with Piastri on the 2 stop. This gave him a great recovery drive but seems to be struggling to return to form. Bearman (HAAS) timed their stops perfectly around laps 22–24, while Russell and Hamilton tried to get clever with offset strategies that didn’t quite pay off. Hamilton’s more so due to the penalty. Further down, the one stoppers like Albon and Tsunoda looked brave but were really just hanging on for dear life by the end of thier first stint. Mexico’s high altitude and hot tarmac made tyre wear the real villain of the race, though a few drivers might still blame “dirty air” instead.

Tyre Strategy
Race Standings Analysis:
If the pit times were surprising, the race standings were downright spicy. Lando Norris (NOR) finally grabbed the win he’d been chasing all season, leading almost every lap and surviving the chaos of Turn 1 like a matador dodging a bull. Charles Leclerc (LEC) finished a fine second after an early charge that kept Ferrari fans waving flags all the way to the end, while Max Verstappen (VER) had to settle for third, a solid result but not quite the homecoming party he’d have wanted. Oscar Piastri (PIA) did his best to minimise WDC impact. Ollie Bearman (BEA) achieved a career best, while young Kimi Antonelli (ANT) once again showed poise beyond his years finish 6th after a swap back of positions with russell. Down the order, Hamilton (HAM) fought hard but couldn’t quite break through and recover from the 10 second penalty. The chart is a beautiful chaos of lines crossing and diving, a visual spaghetti bowl that perfectly sums up Mexico City’s unpredictable race energy.

Position Changes
Pit Times Analysis:
The pit crew heroes of Mexico were, rather unexpectedly, Sauber. Their average time of 22.29 seconds was lightning quick, proof that even if the car’s not the fastest, the mechanics can still flex their muscles. McLaren and Haas weren’t far behind on 22.64 seconds, showcasing slick coordination under the intense Mexican sunshine. Alpine and Mercedes rounded out the efficiency club, both under 23 seconds. Further down, Aston Martin and Ferrari looked like they were serving tapas instead of tyres, clocking 24.14s and 26.40s respectively. Red Bull and VCARB brought up the rear with pit times of over 27 seconds, uncharacteristic for the energy drink giants. Maybe they were just enjoying the mariachi bands echoing down the pit lane. Overall, the spread tells the story of precision at the top and a few too many slow jacks and sticky wheel nuts at the back.

Average Pit Stop
Question
Question of the Week: Has the WDC now Slipped away from Piastri?
Standings
|  Driver Standings |  Constructors Standings | 
Lights Out!
| Founded in 2020, Advanced SimRacing (ASR) makes the best mainstream racing simulation gear in the world . Built super strong and durable. |  | 
